Thursday, February 23, 2006

So why should we worry about the United Arab Emirates owned company, Dubai running our ports? From the New York Times:
While the company in question has not been a focus of investigations, Dubai has been a way station for contraband, some of it nuclear. Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Pakistani nuclear engineer, made Dubai his transshipment point for the equipment he sent to Libya and Iran because he could operate there without worrying about investigators.
And I've been hearing that the White House approved it without Bush knowing about it. I was wondering how such a thing could happen? Well it seems that this is the workings of the mysterious Committee of Foreign Investment:
The debate over the sale should also shed light on the mysterious workings of the Committee on Foreign Investment, an interagency body led by the secretary of the Treasury. Under current rules, the committee can approve deals in which foreign companies take over American properties with national security importance after just a 30-day review, and without the approval of the president.
Creepy.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

The Rude Pundit's post today about the Dubai Ports deal is about the best explanation I've heard of why Bush is having such a hard time convincing people that this is a good idea. Warning: he's a wee bit vulgar.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Ooooooo, Bush is fighting back. He says he's going to veto any legislation that would stop the UAE from managing our ports. Thing is, Bush hasn't vetoed a single bill as of yet, although he threatens to all the time. So yeah yeah veto blahblahblah. Of course if he does veto this bill and it is supported by 2/3 of the senate, they can override his little piddly veto. And as it sounds right now, most of the conservatives and liberals are against this deal. Let's just see who can maintain their backbone.
Well it seems some Republicans don't like Bush's buddies taking over our ports any more than I do. I wonder if they would ever support a bill that Hillary Clinton had anything to do with:
Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey said Monday that he and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., will introduce legislation prohibiting the sale of port operations to foreign governments.
Sounds like a good idea to me.

Monday, February 20, 2006

It is a little disturbing to me to find out that some of our nation's ports are managed by a foreign company. Well the English company that got that contract is now being taken over by another company. This one is based in United Arab Emirates... where 2 of the 9/11 hijackers are from... where 69% of the population hates us. I have so many questions. Like, when did management of our ports go up for bid? And to whom? Did the English company buy out existing American companies?
And how do the pro-Bush talking heads respond to criticism of this? They call racism of course.
And in case you were wondering, the ports in question are in New York and New Jersey; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; Miami, Florida; and New Orleans, Louisiana. (sigh)

Friday, February 17, 2006

Wait a minute, wait a minute... when I read this I was a bit confused. Dick Cheney's shooting victim apologized to him?
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas (AP) - The lawyer shot by Vice President Dick Cheney during a hunting trip was being discharged from a hospital on Friday and told reporters he was sorry for all the trouble Cheney had faced over the past week
Like as if to say 'I'm sorry I got in the way of your shot gun blast, and made you the laughing stock of the country.' Did Cheney even apologize? What a Dick.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

George Lucas says of Dick Cheney:
"The emperor works behind Darth Vader, he doesn't actually stand in front," Lucas said. "I say that in fear of getting hit with a lot of buckshot."
So why do people say such things about the Vice President? Calling him The Emperor, Darth Vader, the Master of Darkness, and other creepy but powerful titles? Most liberals don't even have to think about it, but others may question why he is so deserving of such titles. Here's a few of my reasons:

-Seems smarter than Bush, but less electable so many believe he's pulling the strings of the Bush puppet. It was his idea for Bush to pick him as his running mate. I'm guessing many of the decisions in the Bush White House have been thought up by him.

-Scooter Libby has testified that it was Cheney who told him to call reporters to reveal Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA operative.

-Owns a signifigant stock in Halliburton and was ex-CEO. This company benefits from times of war, therefore Cheney benefits in times of war. That seems icky.

-Went on many television appearances trying to link Iraq to Al Qaeda and 9-11 even when there was no credible evidence to support this.

-Cursed out a nice old man on the Senate floor.

-Oh yeah! And he shot a 78 year old man in the face! Yes, I know it was an accident. But its so bazaar! I just can't stop myself.

But there are still some who don't really believe that he's an evil genius at all but "nothing more than a corrupt, incompetent hack."

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Here's a scary little video which pretty much sums up what I fear to be the real reason why we went into Iraq. Some of it may be over the top but much of it (starting wars for the weapons manufacturers) is very believable especially when you look at who in the administration has an interest in these corporations.

Monday, February 13, 2006

So Dick Cheney has finally gone out and shot somebody. In the face. With a shotgun. Okay, it was a hunting accident. And it seems the guy was far away enough that hopefully he's going to be fine. I saw one report that said he's more bruised up than anything. Yet he's in the Intensive Care Unit? Weird. I've got to admit when I first read the headline I didn't really believe it. I kept thinking 'this can't be true, that's just too bazaar! The Vice President doesn't shoot people!' But yes, from CNN:
Cheney was unaware Whittington had walked up behind him when he swung around to fire his .28-gauge shotgun at one of the birds rising from the grass. He was focused on the bird and did not see Whittington, who was wearing a hunter's "blaze orange" vest, she said.
Washington Post:
"The vice president was concerned," said Mary Matalin, a Cheney adviser who spoke with him yesterday morning. "He felt badly, obviously. On the other hand, he was not careless or incautious or violate any of the [rules]. He didn't do anything he wasn't supposed to do."
Except to shoot the 78 year old lawyer!

Here's what Wonkette has to say:
Dick Cheney Finally Takes a Stand Against Trial Lawyers

Friday, February 10, 2006

While googling for who knows what, I came across this funny Onion piece from a while ago:
CIA Asks Bush To Discontinue Blog
According to McLaughlin, several recent entries on PrezGeorgeW. typepad.com have compromised military operations, while other posts may have seriously undercut the PR efforts of White House press secretary Scott McClellan.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Thanks Matthew for sending me this interesting little article about our passioniately devout christian president:

Around Washington, D.C., it's considered bad form to point out that Bush doesn't regularly attend church. "You don't have to go to church to be a good religious person," argue his defenders. And they're right. They have made much political hay, however, over polls that indicate Democratic voters attend church less frequently than Republicans, so even the most brazen feel compelled to offer explanations for Bush's absence from church membership rolls.

Most Americans are aware that George W. Bush is a religious man. He is, after all, the man who presided over a religious revival of sorts at the Republican National Convention. He is the man who has pioneered what could be called cardio-diplomacy, judging world leaders--and, at times, entire nations--by their "hearts." He is the subject of at least four spiritual hagiographies currently in bookstores, and one religious documentary ("George W. Bush: Faith in the White House"). Most famously, Americans know him as the man who, when asked to cite the philosopher who had the greatest influence on him, named Jesus Christ.

What most--including many of the president's fiercest supporters--don't know, however, is that Bush doesn't go to church. Sure, when he weekends at Camp David, Bush spends Sunday morning with the compound's chaplain. And, every so often, he drops in on the little Episcopal church across Lafayette Park from the White House. But the president who has staked much of his domestic agenda on the argument that religious communities hold the key to solving social problems doesn't belong to a congregation.

It should be a politically intriguing story. Bush is one of the most explicitly religious politicians in American history. Both of his presidential campaigns have used religion to appeal emotionally to voters. The entire philosophy behind his signature slogan, "compassionate conservatism," rests on the belief that religious communities have a unique ability to tend to the nation's social ills. And yet, after the flood of coverage around Bush's first--and only--visit to a neighborhood church during inauguration weekend in Washington, D.C., no one has bothered to report on the president's whereabouts on Sunday mornings.

The first excuse conservatives provide is that Bush can't possibly be expected to have time to go to church, what with being leader of the free world and all. Yet, during Jimmy Carter's four years in the White House, he found time not only to attend a Baptist church in the Washington, D.C., area, but to teach Sunday school there as well. For a presidential delegator like Bush--who has freed up enough time to spend approximately one-third of his presidency on vacation--finding a few hours for church should be a snap.

But, even if Bush had the time for church services, supporters protest, the security precautions necessary for a presidential visit would drive congregants away. This is the exact same argument the Reagan White House trotted out to explain why the patron saint of the religious right hardly ever attended church from 1981 to 1989. Bomb-sniffing dogs, metal detectors, and security personnel, so the theory goes, would pose an onerous burden for the average church. "The president wants to avoid the sort of major weekly disruption that would be caused if he went to church," says David Aikman, author of A Man of Faith: The Spiritual Journey of George W. Bush.

As it happens, I attended Foundry United Methodist Church for several years during the late '90s when the Clintons were members there. The only imposition was the extra ten seconds it took to walk through a metal detector. Parishioners did not leave the church in droves; on the contrary, many were pleasantly surprised to find that the Clintons played an active role in church life, particularly while Chelsea was involved in the choir and youth group.

If time and security aren't the reasons, what excuse does that leave? The very fact that the president doesn't attend church, some leading conservatives insist, is proof of what a good Christian he is. Unlike certain past presidents they could name but won't--ahem, cough, Bill Clinton--Bush doesn't feel the need to prove his religiosity. "This president has not made an issue of where he goes to church," says Michael Cromartie of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. "I find it refreshing that we don't have a president coming out of church with a large Bible under his arm." Conservatives relish this opportunity for a little gratuitous Clinton-bashing. In private, however, they admit the explanation doesn't hold up. "I really don't get it," one prominent Bush partisan told me. "There's no reason why the president couldn't find a church around here if he wanted to."

In truth, Bush probably doesn't spend Sunday morning watching "Meet the Press" or wrestling with The New York Times crossword puzzle. He no doubt observes the Sabbath in his own way, as do millions of Americans who identify themselves as religious but don't attend church. Bush has been shaped by a "small-group" mentality, emphasizing a one-on-one relationship with God over the experience of Christian fellowship in a community.

Or it could be that Bush's faith, while sincere, is not terribly deep. Aikman, who had significant access to Bush confidantes while writing his book, has said that he "could not get from anybody a sort of credo of what [Bush] believes." Nevertheless, Aikman pressed on by "intuit[ing]" Bush's faith and presenting as evidence of the president's deep spiritual commitment his fondness for carrots and jogging (apparently a response to the scriptural admonition to treat the body as a temple for God) and the politeness of White House staffers ("though manners are not specifically connected to George W.'s personal religious faith, it was as though the discipline he brought to his own life of prayer and Bible study filtered down into the work habits of everyone who worked with him").

It shouldn't really matter. A president's religious habits often reveal far less about his faith than the decisions he makes. But, more than any other president, Bush has staked his political reputation on being a devout man of faith. The implied and often explicit responsibility for one another that undergirds congregational life is at the heart of Bush's faith-based policy agenda. The fact that he isn't himself a member of a congregation should be relevant.

It's not as if political reporters have ignored the church-going habits of Bush's opponent. During the "John Kerry Wafer Watch," they have done everything short of inspect the senator's molars for evidence of any unswallowed Host. Hyperbole? A recent Kerry campaign pool report included this observation: "Both Mr. and Mrs. received communion, taking the host from the priests in their hands (others took direct to mouth). They spent ample time on the kneeler."

When Bush moved to Washington in early 2001, many religious observers bandied about the question of which church the incoming president would attend. Four years later, the answer is hidden in plain sight: The emperor has no church.

Amy Sullivan is an editor of The Washington Monthly.


So why oh why wouldn't Bush attend church regularly? Maybe he doesn't agree with any of the ministers, reverends, or priests...or Jesus for that matter. Jesus was a pacifist whose philosophies do resemble socialism more than anything else so its somewhat confusing that Bush named Jesus as his most influential philosopher and then tries to kill all our social programs like social security, medicare and medicaid. And of course there's that thing where he starts wars even when not justified. Maybe going to church reminds him of all his faults, misdeeds and destructive behavior. Or maybe he's just a big ole' liar. Its amazing how Bush's hypocrisy is in just about every aspect of his being.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

In the recent State of the Union address, Bush mentioned reducing America's dependence on oil from the Middle East.
Aaaaha!!! But he was just kidding!!! Get it?!! He didn't mean it "literally"!
Administration backs off Bush's vow to reduce Mideast oil import
WASHINGTON - One day after President Bush vowed to reduce America's dependence on Middle East oil by cutting imports from there 75 percent by 2025, his energy secretary and national economic adviser said Wednesday that the president didn't mean it literally.
That guy kills me!
Weird! Alito voted for a death row inmate's stay of execution? Hmmmm...what to think of this? Maybe he's actually so pro-life that he's against capital punishment? And Bush, the executioner, was being incompetant and not realize his nominee was against the death penalty? I'm so confused...my head hurts.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

G.W. Bush likes to pretend he's in 'the movies'. He says the terrorists are trying to take away our freedom. George, you're not William Wallace. This is not Braveheart. The only freedom I think they're worried about is our freedom to occupy their land with troops. Well at least that seems to be what sets them off. Is that the freedom he's talking about? (Ours is actually being eroded by the Patriot Act, unlawful wiretapping and arrests for wearing T-shirts he doesn't like but that's for another day.)
And hearing him talking about evil empires just made me think of Darth Vader more than anything else. Geez George, Reagan did that already! He needs a new schtick. The Indiana Jones movies were really good, maybe he could sport a cool hat and play with a whip!
Poor wittle O'Weilly. Olberman has some fun a his expense. This is from crooksandliars.com.