Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Why are the jerks in the media going completely bezerk about the fact that Hillary Clinton appeared to be emotional and may have even cried during a campaign event? It was all over the tellie for like 2 days- I'm sure now that she's won New Hampshire, people will be saying it's because she 'finally showed emotion' or that she duped everybody with crocodile tears to feel sorry for her or whatever. Who cares? The dudes cried too. Ole Mittens Romney cried on the campaign trail at least twice- and no one even flenched. I mean is it really big news that a woman who is under tremendous stress cried? Sadly, it is. And who cares if it's fake- she's a politician- they all lie!!! But I'm wondering if any other "more womanly" traits will be scrutinized because she is a woman. If she gets angry will that 'be a contrivance' or 'it's because she must be on her period' or 'must be menapause'. Since when is showing emotion a weakness? ... I mean other than when you're playing poker.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

That would be politically incorrect to judge her on her "more womanly" traits. Actually, I'm starting think she is a man. Even if she does cry.

9:04 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I'm sick of the word clinton and she looks like a burly old man

11:03 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home